Patna · DRT Patna · Patna High Court · RBI Compromise Settlement Framework
A bank loan settlement — called a bank OTS (One Time Settlement) or debt settlement — is a negotiated compromise in which the lender accepts less than the full outstanding in full and final satisfaction of an NPA account. In Patna, every OTS is governed by the RBI Framework for Compromise Settlements and Technical Write-offs dated 8 June 2023, run through the bank’s Board-approved policy, and — where it breaks down — litigated before DRT Patna, DRAT Allahabad and the Patna High Court.
90d
NPA Threshold for OTS
40–70%
Typical OTS Range
7 yrs
CIBIL “Settled” Tag
41(1)
Tax on Waived Interest
Patna-specific: where a bank loan settlement is negotiated and enforced
If your loan account has turned NPA at a bank branch in Patna — Kankarbagh, Boring Road, Bailey Road, Exhibition Road, Patliputra, Rajendra Nagar, Danapur, Kadamkuan, Maurya Lok or Gandhi Maidan — the bank OTS proposal goes to that branch’s Recovery / Stressed Assets Management desk, then upward to the Regional Office, Credit Committee and, for large accounts, the Board. If the settlement breaks down, the forum is DRT Patna under Section 19 of the RDB Act; the appeal is to DRAT Allahabad; and the writ court is the Patna High Court. For a Bihar Gramin Bank account, the Regional Manager is the competent authority for sympathetic consideration — as the Patna High Court itself directed in Suman Kumar v. State of Bihar.
The RBI’s June 2023 Framework replaced the earlier OTS circulars and created a single, uniform rulebook for every regulated entity. Understanding its four pillars is the difference between a settlement that closes the account and one that collapses.
RBI/2023-24/40 · DOR.STR.REC.20/21.04.048/2023-24 · 8 June 2023
A bank OTS is the formal, Board-policy-driven compromise of a term loan, cash credit or business facility — normally above ₹1 crore, processed through the Credit Committee with a written sanction letter on official letterhead.
Debt settlement is the broader commercial term, covering OTS of personal loans, credit cards and smaller unsecured facilities, often handled by recovery agents or at Lok Adalat. Both end in a reduced payment and a “Settled” credit-bureau tag — but only OTS produces the formal sanction letter, NDC and CERSAI discharge that a business borrower needs.
Under the RBI’s consumer protection rules on loan defaults, verbal-only OTS arrangements are banned entirely. Every settlement now requires a written letter on official letterhead, detailing the exact terms, before a single rupee is collected.
For a Patna borrower, this is protective: if a recovery agent offers a figure on the phone and asks for a transfer, there is no settlement. Insist on the Core Banking System (CBS) OTS sanction letter signed by an authorised Scale-IV officer before paying anything.
The OTS process is not a single negotiation. It is a documented application, an internal credit approval chain, a written sanction, a payment schedule and a closure — and each stage has a paper trail the bank will check.
The borrower submits a written bank OTS proposal to the Recovery / NPA department, stating the proposed OTS amount, the payment timeline, the basis for the figure, and the conditions. It must be accompanied by a documented hardship file — audited financials, ITRs, bank statements, medical records, termination letters or business closure proof.
Forum: Branch Recovery desk, PatnaThe bank’s Recovery department prepares an internal note comparing the proposal against the Board-approved policy — eligibility, minimum ageing, collateral value, and the net present value of expected recovery through DRT or SARFAESI enforcement versus immediate OTS cash.
Forum: Bank Recovery / SAMB, PatnaMost banks require Credit Committee approval for OTS above a threshold — commonly ₹5 crore — and full Board approval above the Committee’s delegated authority, often ₹25 crore in large banks. Board meetings are monthly, which adds time.
Forum: Zonal / Head OfficeThe bank issues an OTS sanction letter specifying the agreed OTS amount, the payment schedule (upfront plus instalments), the validity of the offer — typically 90 to 120 days — the conditions (no transfer of assets, securities to remain in the bank’s name until completion) and the consequences of default.
Forum: Bank on official letterheadThe OTS deed — also called the compromise deed or consent terms — is the binding contract. It must name the borrower, co-borrowers and guarantors, record the OTS amount and schedule, provide for suspension of DRT and SARFAESI proceedings, and specify guarantor and security release on completion. Payment must be by cheque, NEFT or RTGS — never cash.
Forum: Bank branch, PatnaOn receipt of the full OTS amount, the bank issues a No Dues Certificate (NDC), withdraws all DRT and SARFAESI proceedings, returns the original title documents, and files the CERSAI discharge. Without the NDC, the bank can later resurrect a claim for “interest accrued during settlement processing”.
Forum: Bank branch, PatnaThe bank reports the account to CIBIL, Experian and Equifax. The status becomes “Settled” — not “Closed” — and this tag remains for up to seven years from the date of settlement, typically dropping the score by 75–100 points.
Forum: Credit bureausPatna practice note: OTS at the DRT Patna Recovery Officer stage
If a decree has already been passed and a Recovery Certificate issued, a bank loan settlement is still possible — the parties can file a joint application before the Recovery Officer recording the settlement, and the modes of recovery are then dealt with under Sections 25 to 28 of the RDB Act, 1993. Where the bank consents, the OTS can also be recorded as consent terms before DRT Patna, producing a consent decree directly enforceable by the Recovery Officer without a fresh original application. This is often the fastest route for a Patna borrower facing attachment.
Under RBI compromise settlement norms, banks cannot grant discretionary principal write-offs without an audited hardship dossier proving involuntary inability to pay. The burden of proof sits squarely on the borrower.
A settlement is only as strong as the paper it sits on. If the bank asks for more money after you have already paid, you are entitled to insist on a written sanction letter fixing the final figure and confirming the NOC before you pay another rupee.
The letter must identify the exact account and state the total outstanding — principal, interest and penalty separately. A letter that fixes a settlement figure without stating what it settles is unenforceable against a later claim.
Verify against the CBS recordThe precise OTS figure, the upfront percentage (typically 20–30%), the instalment dates, and the account into which payment is to be made. The offer validity window — usually 90 to 120 days — must be stated.
Patna branch-level verificationAn express recital that the OTS amount is accepted in full and final satisfaction of all claims under the loan and guarantee, and that no further amount is payable.
Essential for DRT Patna consent termsAn OTS signed only by the corporate borrower does not automatically discharge personal guarantors unless the OTS deed expressly releases them. Guarantors must join the deed as confirming parties, and the release must be in writing.
Frequent gap in Patna corporate OTS deedsThe bank’s undertaking to return original title documents, release the mortgage, and file CERSAI discharge on receipt of the full OTS amount. Without it, the charge remains on the Patna property even after payment.
Check CERSAI after closureAn express clause that failure to pay any instalment entitles the bank to revoke the OTS and resume all enforcement proceedings, with full rights to claim the original outstanding minus payments made. Read this clause before signing — it is the clause that undoes the settlement.
Litigated before DRT Patna and DRATWhether the portion of the loan written off is taxable depends on what was waived, why the loan was taken, and who is doing the settling. Three provisions matter.
Section 41(1) — Income Tax Act, 1961
If the borrower had claimed a deduction for accrued interest on the loan in earlier years — common for business borrowers where loan interest is a business expense — and the bank now waives that accrued interest as part of the OTS, the waived interest is treated as a cessation of liability under Section 41(1) and is taxable in the year the OTS deed is executed.
Taxable: waived interest previously claimed as deductionSection 28(iv) — judicial position is split
The Gujarat High Court has held that Section 28(iv) applies only to non-monetary benefits and perquisites, so a cash waiver cannot be taxed under it. But the Madras High Court in CIT v. Ramaniyam Hotels differed, holding that waiver of the principal portion of a term loan should have been taxed under Section 28(iv). The safe course for a Patna borrower is a written opinion from a Chartered Accountant before signing the OTS deed, and factoring the exposure into the offer made to the bank.
Position depends on loan purpose — obtain a CA opinionSection 56(2)(x) — Income from Other Sources
If the bank converts the loan or interest into equity, Section 56(2)(x) applies: the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of conversion and the consideration paid or adjusted is treated as deemed income. For a Patna MSME or company borrower, this is the provision most often missed when an OTS is structured as a debt-to-equity swap.
Taxable: FMV of shares minus considerationPractical note for Patna borrowers
The principal amount waived — the difference between the outstanding principal and the OTS principal accepted — is generally not taxable under Section 41(1), because the original borrowing was not a deductible expense. The complexity arises for financial companies where the loan was recorded as a liability and the waiver creates a credit to the profit and loss account. Document the settlement terms precisely so the accounting and tax treatment can be justified to the Assessing Officer.
Not taxable under 41(1): principal waiverA bank loan settlement resolves the debt with the lender. It does not resolve the credit report. That single word on the CIBIL record is what every future lender reads.
Once the OTS is completed, the account status on the CIBIL report changes from “Closed” to “Settled”. That notation typically remains for up to seven years from the date of settlement, and drops the score by 75–100 points.
It affects eligibility for fresh credit and pushes up the interest rate on any loan that is approved. For a Patna borrower planning a home loan, business expansion or a fresh working capital facility, this is often the real cost of the settlement.
The RBI Master Circular permits a borrower to later pay the waived amount to the bank and obtain a “Settlement-to-Closed Upgrade” letter confirming full recovery. Filed with CIBIL, the status changes from “Settled” to “Closed”.
This is the cleanest route to restoring creditworthiness after a bank loan settlement — and it should be negotiated into the OTS deed as an option, where the borrower expects to be able to fund the balance later.
The Patna High Court has been consistent on one point: a writ petition is not the route to compel a bank to settle. The statutory remedy must be exhausted first — and there is a specific forum for each breakdown.
| Situation | Forum in Patna | What the forum can do |
|---|---|---|
| Bank refuses to consider an OTS proposal | Regional Manager / Nodal Officer of the bank | Representation on sympathetic grounds; the Patna High Court has directed banks to decide such representations within three months |
| Bank accepts OTS but refuses to issue NDC or release security | DRT Patna | Enforce the OTS deed as consent terms under Section 19 RDB Act where the OTS was entered into during DRT proceedings |
| Bank resiles from a settlement already part-paid | DRT Patna / Patna High Court | DRT can record and enforce the settlement; writ is ordinarily barred where SARFAESI remedy exists |
| Bank delays or harasses during OTS processing | RBI Integrated Ombudsman (cms.rbi.org.in) | Complain after 30 days of no reply; Ombudsman can award up to ₹30 lakh for consequential loss and ₹3 lakh for harassment |
| Settlement recorded at Lok Adalat but induced by misrepresentation | DRT Patna → Patna High Court | DRT can recall the settlement order; the Patna High Court has upheld this power |
| OTS defaulted — bank revives SARFAESI | DRT Patna under Section 17 | Challenge the Section 13(4) measure within 45 days of the revival |
The Supreme Court’s warning to banks that resile after settlement
The Supreme Court has held that initiating criminal proceedings for fraud and forgery after a final bank loan settlement — particularly an OTS endorsed by a judicial forum — is an abuse of process, and that the sanctity of OTS must be protected. For a Patna borrower who has paid under a recorded settlement, this is the strongest authority against a bank that later reopens the account.
Five rulings that decide how a Patna OTS dispute will be treated — and what a writ court will and will not do.
Patna High Court · Suman Kumar v. State of Bihar
The petitioner, who had availed an education loan and defaulted, sought a one-time settlement, a five-year repayment extension and a partial waiver through a writ petition under Article 226. The Patna High Court held that the inability to repay was a personal financial grievance, not a legal wrong by the State or the bank. With no breach of statutory duty, violation of natural justice or infringement of a specific legal right, the writ was not maintainable. The Court granted liberty to file a representation before the Regional Manager, Bihar Gramin Bank, and directed that it be decided within three months.
Holding: No writ to compel OTS — representation route insteadPatna High Court · Sanjay Kumar Singh v. Punjab National Bank · 1 Oct 2026
The proprietor of a rice mill at Kutumba, Aurangabad, alleged that a settlement dated 29 December 2021 fixed his liability at ₹25,70,000, that he had already deposited ₹20,00,000, and that PNB refused to accept the balance. Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy declined to entertain the writ, relying on United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and Celir LLP v. Bafna Motors: the High Court will ordinarily not entertain Article 226 where an effective remedy is available, and this rule applies with greater rigour in recovery of bank dues. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the appropriate forum, with the aspect of limitation left open.
Holding: Writ barred — go to the SARFAESI forumPatna High Court · Syed Mohammad Gufran
The borrower challenged the bank’s rejection of successive bank OTS proposals, including a proposal to pay ₹3,95,608. The Patna High Court found that the petition raised disputed questions about the legality of the recovery measures and the applicability of the relevant OTS policy — matters for the statutory forum, not for Article 226.
Holding: OTS policy disputes go to the statutory forum, not the writ courtPatna High Court · 2025
In a Mega Lok Adalat held at the tribunal on 17 December 2014, the petitioner gave the impression that he had already discharged the bank’s dues when only a fraction had been paid. The Patna High Court dismissed the borrower’s writ challenging the DRT’s recall of that settlement, holding that the DRT has the power to recall orders made under a factual mistake or induced by fraud.
Holding: DRT can recall a settlement obtained by misrepresentationPatna High Court · Deepak Kumar v. State of Bihar
Where the matter was settled under the One-Time Settlement scheme and nothing remained payable by the petitioner to the bank, the Patna High Court held that the writ petition had become infructuous. The practical lesson: complete the OTS and obtain the NDC — the litigation then falls away on its own.
Holding: Completed OTS renders pending writ infructuousEvery forum a bank OTS proposal, dispute and enforcement will move through, with Patna addresses.
OTS Proposal & Sanction
Your Bank Branch in Patna
Any scheduled commercial bank, NBFC or regional rural bank branch in Patna — Kankarbagh, Boring Road, Bailey Road, Exhibition Road, Patliputra, Rajendra Nagar, Danapur, Kadamkuan, Maurya Lok or Gandhi Maidan. The OTS proposal goes to the branch Recovery / Stressed Assets desk.
Sympathetic Consideration — RRB Accounts
Regional Manager, Bihar Gramin Bank
Bihar Gramin Bank, Patna. For a Gramin Bank account, the Regional Manager is the competent authority to consider a representation on sympathetic grounds — the route the Patna High Court directed in Suman Kumar.
Enforcement of OTS / Recovery
DRT Patna — Debt Recovery Tribunal
Debt Recovery Tribunal, Patna, Bihar. OTS can be recorded as consent terms under Section 19 RDB Act; the Recovery Officer enforces the consent decree under Sections 25–28.
Appeal
DRAT Allahabad
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad — the appellate forum for DRT Patna orders, including orders refusing to record or recall a settlement.
Writ Petition
Patna High Court
Patna High Court, Bailey Road, Patna. Article 226 — available only where the statutory remedy is exhausted or a jurisdictional error is shown.
Your Counsel
Advocate Simran Kumari — Kankarbagh Chamber
P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, G-8, Patna – 800020. Open everyday 10:00 AM – 7:00 PM. Call +91 92314 45078 or email advocatesimrankumari@gmail.com.
A bank loan settlement — called a bank OTS or debt settlement — is a negotiated compromise in which the lender accepts a lump sum or structured payment that is less than the total outstanding, in full and final satisfaction of an NPA account. The borrower pays the agreed amount, and the bank closes the account, releases the securities and issues a No Dues Certificate. It is formally termed a “compromise settlement” in RBI circulars and is governed by the RBI Framework for Compromise Settlements and Technical Write-offs dated 8 June 2023.
No. OTS is available only for accounts classified as Non-Performing Assets under the RBI’s IRAC norms — accounts in default for 90 days or more. Standard assets — accounts current or overdue for less than 90 days — cannot be compromised. Substandard, doubtful and loss accounts, including fully written-off accounts, are eligible. Wilful default and fraud accounts can also be settled under the June 2023 Framework, subject to Board-recorded justification and a 12-month cooling-off period.
No. OTS is a commercial decision of the lender, not a right available to the borrower. The RBI framework treats the bank’s decision on an OTS proposal as a commercial judgment the regulator will not override. However, where the bank’s Board-approved policy provides for OTS in a particular account category, the bank must apply the policy consistently and cannot arbitrarily deny an eligible borrower on grounds not specified in the policy.
From the hardship side: Income Tax Returns for 2–3 years showing decline or loss, audited P&L and GST filings for business borrowers, 6–12 months of certified bank statements across all accounts, medical records for chronic illness, termination letters for job loss, a death certificate where applicable, and a written statement of hardship explaining the original loan terms, cause of default, current income and maximum offer. From the loan side: the facility-wise account statement, sanction letter, security and guarantee documents, and a CERSAI search report for the Patna property charge.
The seven stages are: (1) written OTS proposal with hardship file to the Recovery / NPA department; (2) the bank’s internal assessment against its Board-approved policy, comparing the OTS amount against the net present value of expected recovery through DRT or SARFAESI; (3) Credit Committee approval, commonly above ₹5 crore, and Board approval above the Committee’s delegated authority, often ₹25 crore; (4) OTS sanction letter issued, typically valid 90–120 days; (5) OTS deed signed and payment made by cheque, NEFT or RTGS; (6) No Dues Certificate, withdrawal of DRT and SARFAESI proceedings, return of title documents and CERSAI discharge; (7) credit bureau reporting as “Settled”.
Typical OTS settlements fall in the range of 40% to 70% of the outstanding — that is, the borrower pays 40–70% and the bank waives penalty and interest, and sometimes a portion of principal. The percentage moves with the stage: a first offer after 90 days may be 80–90% of outstanding, after 180+ days NPA it may be 60–75%, after legal notice or SARFAESI it may be 40–55%, and for old written-off accounts of 3+ years it can fall to 25–40%. The bank’s calculus is simple: compare immediate OTS cash against the probability of legal recovery two to four years later, net of 30%+ legal cost.
It depends on what was waived. Waived interest that was claimed as a deduction in earlier years is taxable under Section 41(1) as a cessation of liability, in the year the OTS deed is executed. Waived principal is generally not taxable under Section 41(1) because the original borrowing was not a deductible expense. Section 28(iv) is contested — the Gujarat High Court has held it applies only to non-monetary benefits, while the Madras High Court in Ramaniyam Hotels held that waiver of the principal of a term loan should be taxed under it. Where the loan or interest is converted into equity, Section 56(2)(x) taxes the difference between the fair market value of the shares and the consideration paid. Obtain a written CA opinion before signing the OTS deed.
The account status changes from “Closed” to “Settled”, and that notation remains on the credit report for up to seven years from the date of settlement, typically dropping the score by 75–100 points. This affects eligibility for fresh credit and increases the interest rate on any loan that is approved. The RBI Master Circular permits a later “Settlement-to-Closed Upgrade”: the borrower pays the waived amount, the bank issues an upgrade letter confirming full recovery, and the status changes from “Settled” to “Closed”.
An OTS deed is a binding contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Where the OTS was entered into during DRT proceedings, DRT Patna has jurisdiction to enforce it as consent terms under Section 19 of the RDB Act. The Supreme Court has also held that initiating criminal proceedings for fraud and forgery after a final settlement — particularly one endorsed by a judicial forum — is an abuse of process, and that the sanctity of OTS must be protected. The Patna High Court, however, has repeatedly refused writ petitions to enforce an OTS where the SARFAESI statutory remedy remains available.
Ordinarily, no. In Suman Kumar v. State of Bihar, the Patna High Court held that inability to repay is a personal financial grievance, not a legal wrong, and a writ of mandamus cannot direct a bank to grant a waiver or extension absent a violation of legal or fundamental rights. In Sanjay Kumar Singh v. Punjab National Bank (1 October 2026), the Court refused to entertain a writ to enforce a ₹25.70 lakh PNB settlement despite ₹20 lakh already paid, holding that the SARFAESI remedy must be exhausted first. The writ route is preserved for jurisdictional errors — not for enforcing a commercial settlement.
Not automatically. An OTS signed only by the corporate borrower does not discharge the personal guarantee liability of the promoters or directors who signed guarantee deeds, unless the OTS deed expressly releases the guarantor. Banks typically require personal guarantors to join the OTS deed as confirming parties. For a Patna company borrower, the guarantor release clause must be negotiated into the deed — not assumed.
Advocate Simran Kumari negotiates and documents bank OTS and debt settlement proposals, drafts the OTS deed and hardship representation, and appears before DRT Patna and the Patna High Court where a settlement breaks down — from the Kankarbagh chamber. If the loan account is with a Patna branch, the proposal goes to that branch’s Recovery desk. Call +91 92314 45078 or email advocatesimrankumari@gmail.com with the loan account statement and the latest notice for a same-day assessment.
Your Patna Counsel
Bank OTS · Debt Settlement · DRT Patna · SARFAESI · Patna High Court
Advocate Simran Kumari is a Patna-based advocate practising before the Patna High Court, DRT Patna, DRAT Allahabad, GSTAT Patna Bench and ITAT Patna Bench. Enrolled with Bar Enrolment No. BR/1115/2023, her banking practice covers bank loan settlement and bank OTS negotiation, OTS deed drafting, hardship representation, consent terms before DRT Patna, SARFAESI Section 13(2) and 13(3A) objections, Section 17 applications and Section 18 appeals — for borrowers, guarantors and MSME proprietors across Patna, Danapur, Khagaul and Phulwari Sharif.
Chamber: P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, G-8, Patna – 800020, Bihar
Telephone: +91 92314 45078
Email: advocatesimrankumari@gmail.com
Bar Enrolment No.: BR/1115/2023
Hours: Open everyday, 10:00 AM – 7:00 PM
Send the loan account statement, the latest demand notice and your hardship documents to the Kankarbagh chamber. Advocate Simran Kumari assesses the OTS viability against the bank’s Board-approved policy, drafts the proposal and the settlement deed, and — where the settlement breaks down — appears before DRT Patna and the Patna High Court.
Disclaimer
This page is published for general information only and does not constitute legal advice or solicitation. RBI compromise settlement norms, income tax treatment of waivers, credit bureau reporting rules and DRT procedure are amended from time to time. The taxability of a waived amount depends on the facts of the particular case and requires a Chartered Accountant’s opinion. The applicable position on any matter must be verified against the current statutory text and the facts of the particular matter. Engagement of the chamber is subject to a written scope and fee arrangement. No outcome is guaranteed.
Law last checked: 20 October 2026.